Free Cash Flow Conversion: Why It Matters For Investors

What it means, how it’s calculated and why it matters

A Quick Note: Thank you for your patience as I delay my 5th stock analysis by a few more days. When share prices soften on a quality business, sometimes the best move is simply to wait - after all, there's no point rushing in when the market might hand you a better entry price.

Dear investor,

I hope this message finds you well.

I’ve mentioned this before, but it’s worth repeating: free cash flow is probably the most important number you should look at when evaluating any company. Why? Because it cuts through all the accounting noise and shows you what's really happening with a business’s money.

Today, we’re going to take a look at a metric called “free cash flow conversion”.

Free cash flow conversion is a financial metric that measures how efficiently a company converts its net income (or other earnings metrics like EBIDTA) into actual cash flow.

It shows what percentage of reported earnings translates into cash that the company can actually use for operations, investments, debt repayment, or dividend distributions to shareholders.

How to Calculate Free Cash Flow Conversion

The most common and most simple formula is:

Free Cash Flow Conversion = (Free Cash Flow ÷ Net Income) × 100

Where:

  • Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures

  • Net Income = Bottom-line profit after all expenses and taxes

Free cash flow conversion matters because:

  1. Quality of Earnings: A high conversion rate indicates that reported profits are backed by actual cash generation

  2. Financial Health: Companies with poor conversion may have earnings inflated by non-cash items or aggressive accounting

  3. Sustainability: Cash flow is what actually pays bills, funds growth, and returns capital to shareholders

  4. Red Flags: Consistently low conversion rates can signal accounting manipulation or deteriorating business fundamentals

  5. Peer Comparison: Helps compare companies’ operational efficiency

What Good vs. Poor Free Cash Flow Conversion Looks Like

  • 100%+: Excellent - the company generates more cash than reported earnings

  • 80-100%: Good - most earnings convert to cash

  • 60-80%: Acceptable - reasonable conversion with some working capital or timing differences

  • Below 60%: Concerning - significant gap between reported profits and cash generation

  • Negative: Red flag - company reports profits but burns cash

Some Examples (From Their Q2 Reports)

Microsoft

  • Net Income: $27.233 billion

  • Free Cash Flow: $25.568 billion

  • Free Cash Flow Conversion: (25.568 / 27.233) x 100 = 93,88%

Alphabet

  • Net Income: $28.196 billion

  • Free Cash Flow: $5.301 billion

  • Free Cash Flow Conversion: (5.301 / 28.196) x 100 = 18,80 %

Apple

  • Net Income: $23.434 billion

  • Free Cash Flow: $24.404 billion

  • Free Cash Flow Conversion: (24.404 / 23.434) x 100 = 104,13%

Cracker Barrel

  • Net Income: $12.57 million

  • Free Cash Flow: $-13.63 million

  • Free Cash Flow Conversion: (-13.63 / 12.57) x 100 = -108,35%

What to keep in mind when looking at these numbers:

First things first - don't rely on just one metric to judge a company.

Here are a few key things to consider:

Recent big investments matter. If a company just spent a fortune on new equipment or technology (think about all those AI investments tech companies are making), their cash flow might look temporarily weaker. That's not necessarily bad - it’s like a restaurant owner buying new ovens. The cash flow takes a hit now, but it could pay off later.

Look at the bigger picture over time. One bad quarter doesn’t tell the whole story. I always recommend looking at 3-5 years of data to see what's normal for that business. Some quarters will be outliers because companies need to invest for the future. What you’re really looking for is the average pattern.

Different industries play by different rules. Tech companies usually convert earnings to cash pretty efficiently - often 80-100% or even more. Oil companies? Not so much. They typically run lower because they’re constantly investing in expensive equipment and dealing with volatile commodity prices. It's like comparing a software developer's expenses to a construction worker’s - completely different cost structures.

The quality test is simple:

  • High-quality companies consistently convert 80-100%+ of their earnings to actual cash, generate steady cash flow, keep their finances in good shape, and can both grow the business AND return money to shareholders through dividends or buybacks.

  • Low-quality companies struggle to hit even 60% conversion consistently. They report profits on paper, but the cash just isn’t there. Often they’re boosting earnings with accounting tricks or having trouble collecting money from customers. These are red flags that suggest deeper problems.

Final thoughts

Free cash flow conversion gives you insight into whether a company’s profits are real, sustainable, and backed by actual cash generation - which is ultimately what drives shareholder value and business sustainability.

Speaking of high-quality companies...

While I was preparing this article, I couldn’t help but think about a particular stock that perfectly exemplifies what exceptional free cash flow conversion looks like in practice.

This B2B company doesn’t just hit the 100%+ mark we talked about - it has consistently maintained free cash flow conversion rates above 100% year after year. In fact, their most recent quarter showed a remarkable 117% conversion rate.

But here’s what makes this investment truly compelling: governments worldwide are essentially forcing businesses to use their products through regulatory mandates. Imagine having customers who have to buy from you by law.

This creates the kind of predictable, recession-resistant cash flow that every investor dreams of - the type that keeps generating money whether the economy is booming or struggling.

I first analyzed this company last year, and despite everything that’s happened in the markets since then, the core investment thesis remains as strong as ever. The regulatory tailwinds have only intensified, and their financial metrics continue to impress.

If you want to see exactly which company I’m talking about - and understand why this could be one of the most overlooked cash-generating machines in today’s market - you can access my complete analysis below.

Until the next issue.

If you enjoy The Onveston Letter, let me and the algorithm know by clicking the “Like” button ❤️.

And if you aren’t a subscriber yet, then sign up below to not miss out on future articles.

For new readers: Check out all my previous posts here

Disclaimer: This analysis is not advice to buy or sell this or any stock; it is just pointing out an objective observation of unique patterns that developed from my research. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer to buy or sell securities or to give individual investment advice.

Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Reply

or to participate.